<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED - hwdb: Logitech, Inc. RX 250 Optical Mouse DPI data (older model)"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87435#c6">Comment # 6</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED - hwdb: Logitech, Inc. RX 250 Optical Mouse DPI data (older model)"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87435">bug 87435</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:phomes@gmail.com" title="Thomas H.P. Andersen <phomes@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Thomas H.P. Andersen</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>That sounds reasonable. I was working on a patch for mouse-dpi-tool to show the
frequencies in a histogram. If we only really need the max frequency then
current code is fine. In my testing the mouse would use 142.9Hz ~90% of the
time. I could not find any specific steps to trigger the higher or lower
frequencies. I guess the user just has to move the mouse for a while and hope
we have found the max?
When measuring I used a blank piece of paper with some lines to indicate the
distance I want to move. For laser mice I usually get a slightly higher dpi
than the mouse was specified for. E.g. 855 from a mouse claiming to do 800. For
the optical mice I got a lot worse dpi. ~200 dpi less than the spec for my
case. Simply drawing a lot of doodles with a pen on the paper helps.
For all the mice I tested I was able to find an advertised dpi on the internet.
I just tested that I could get reasonably close to that dpi with your tool and
then used the advertised value. Does that make sense?
Nitpick: the tool truncates the frequency when creating the hwdb entry. So for
142.9Hz it will use xxx@142.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>