<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO - RFE: loginctl: add GroupsMember=GroupName1(GID1), GroupName2(GID2),...,GroupNameN(GIDN)" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88286#c4">Comment # 4</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO - RFE: loginctl: add GroupsMember=GroupName1(GID1), GroupName2(GID2),...,GroupNameN(GIDN)" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88286">bug 88286</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:mikhail.kasimov@gmail.com" title="Mikhail Kasimov <mikhail.kasimov@gmail.com>"> Mikhail Kasimov</a> <pre>Why precsiely do you think "systemctl status something" should show this too, that wouldn't be covered with the simple "service something status" in sysvinit? :P :) To be more serious: systemd, as a fact, often duplicates most habitual things, but with its own syntax. In that logic "loginctl show-user" makes the same to simple "id", "whoami" commands (speaking it more simply). So, as for me in role of an admin, if I use systemd command "loginctl", I'd like to have the possibility to view list of groups, which user belongs to without using anything else. This makes user-info _more complete_ and it's more convinient. I think you agree with me. Of course, I also have the alternative with "id" command. Or just like of using xinetd instead of some systemd functionality and so on.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>