<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - standalone version of systemd to act as a process control system" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88986#c2">Comment # 2</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - standalone version of systemd to act as a process control system" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88986">bug 88986</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:sss@lambdacurry.com" title="Sandeep Srinivasa <sss@lambdacurry.com>"> Sandeep Srinivasa</a> <pre>@lennart - really appreciate the comment. I do understand that you might not do it - but please allow me to explain why it would be a great idea. There is only a single reason - we are already using way too many process control managers. There are hundreds of millions of servers worldwide that will not be upgraded any time soon (years atleast) and that means a long time before anyone will be able to touch systemd professionally. Docker is only making things even worse - the recommended way of using Docker is shifting gradually to be using poorly-suited PID 1 processes like supervisord. I'm not sure how difficult it is technically, but I urge you to reconsider atleast the possibility - even if you can make something on par with supervisord and has none of the advanced resource management features that systemd has. P.S. Already, a lot of us work with upgraded kernels because of Docker and this is already acceptable.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>