<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [systemd] ipv4 forwarding not configured - systemd-sysctl fails to configure from /etc/sysctl.d/*.conf" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89491#c2">Comment # 2</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - [systemd] ipv4 forwarding not configured - systemd-sysctl fails to configure from /etc/sysctl.d/*.conf" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89491">bug 89491</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:james@nurealm.net" title="James <james@nurealm.net>"> James</a> <pre><a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - systemd-networkd: net.ipv4.conf.default.forwarding is ignored in 219" href="show_bug.cgi?id=89509">Bug 89509</a> - systemd-networkd: net.ipv4.conf.default.forwarding is ignored in 219 <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - systemd-networkd: net.ipv4.conf.default.forwarding is ignored in 219" href="show_bug.cgi?id=89509">https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89509</a> "Yeah this was an underdocumented change in 219: we manage the IP forwarding setting per interfac now. You have to set IPForward=yes in the .network files explicitly now, otherwise you will not get IP forwarding on that interface." Seriously?! "Either way, Tom really needs to sign off on this." So then, Tom gets to decide personally, for the entire world-wide Linux-using community, whether to unilaterally "break" sysctl? Seriously?! Something like "the poster child for 'arrogant'" comes to mind...</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the QA Contact for the bug.</li> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>