[systemd-devel] 'tasks' as first-order objects?
lennart at poettering.net
Sat Aug 14 08:59:39 PDT 2010
On Fri, 13.08.10 12:16, Bill Nottingham (notting at redhat.com) wrote:
> Lennart Poettering (lennart at poettering.net) said:
> > Yes, I share the same belief, which is one of the reasons I'd be happy
> > to rename this.
> > So, Kay and I came up with these two ideas:
> > KeepAfterExit=
> > ActiveAfterExit=
> It brings back the word you just dropped elsewhere, but maybe
> 'FinishedOnExit' or similar?
But that again trusn the lgoic around.
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.
More information about the systemd-devel