[systemd-devel] systemd - move /selinux to /sys/fs/selinux - maybe remove /srv ?
Daniel J Walsh
dwalsh at redhat.com
Fri Apr 29 16:07:17 PDT 2011
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 04/29/2011 06:56 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fri, 29.04.11 00:37, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp4x4 at gmail.com) wrote:
>> I think it's a very good decision - I never understood why selinux dir
>> is directly under /.
> Yes, I think this would be a good thing to have in F16.
> Note however that this needs a tiny kernel patch to work, to create the
> mount point under /sys/fs/selinux. This is a trivial patch and has been
> done for /sys/fs/cgroup before, so I assume this would be easy to get
> in and just needs a champion to push this forward.
>> By the way, maybe it would be good to think about the meaning of /srv
>> existance? For seven years FHS requires that this directory exists
>> but "The methodology used to name subdirectories of /srv is
>> unspecified as there is currently no consensus on how this should be
>> done" - so even the authors of the standard did not have anything to
>> say about how this directory should be used. Is there a rational
>> reason for the existence of this directory besides FHS conformance?
> I think /srv actually makes a lot of sense. Probably not so much on the
> desktop, but the boundaries are blurry, and I see no reason to set
> things up differently in this respect between servers and desktops. I
> see little benefit in removing this directory.
I think moving /selinux is a bit more complicated then just a simple
kernel change. We have libselinux changes, Lots of tools have learned
over the years the path of /selinux and lots of users know about it.
I am willing to work towards the goal of moving /selinux, but I might
end up with a symbolic link if we can not fix all of the problems.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the systemd-devel