[systemd-devel] RFC: creating a set of systemd RPM macros across distributions ?
kay.sievers at vrfy.org
Mon Jul 4 10:28:54 PDT 2011
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 14:57, Frederic Crozat <fcrozat at suse.com> wrote:
> Le lundi 04 juillet 2011 à 14:53 +0200, Kay Sievers a écrit :
>> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 14:10, Frederic Crozat <fcrozat at suse.com> wrote:
>> > (this macro could refer to different package, if people don't agree on
>> > systemd-units as packagename)
>> I don't agree on the split-off in general. :)
>> I don't really see how a subpackage gives us any advantage, and we
>> should not recommend its use, I think.
> In that case, I suggest we keep the macro name in the proposal (because
> we want other packages to requires "some" systemd package in their
> specfile, but the content of the macro can change in distributions.
What's the point of having "some" sub-package at all? I guess, stuff
should just depend on systemd.rpm instead of making it all needlessly
complicated. Or should I package udev-rules.rpm next? :)
More information about the systemd-devel