[systemd-devel] [PATCH 2/2] fsck: Add support for EFI variable based fsck indication

"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" johannbg at gmail.com
Thu Apr 9 03:17:40 PDT 2015


On 04/09/2015 08:54 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Of course, this only works for GPT systems, i.e. modern systems, and
> modern systems probably wouldn't run ext234 anyway, so maybe it's not
> worth it... Actually neither xfs nor btrfs nor reiserfs appear to
> require an fsck still, it's only ext234 and vfat. And I figure it's
> not worth fixing this for ext234 now...

Now I just have to ask since I have a hard time understanding where you 
are coming from regarding your view on filesystems in general, their 
future thus the upstream choices you are making seem quite illogical to 
me...

What is your definition of modern system?

Why are you under the assumption that modern systems wont run those 
filesystems?

Where is that assumption coming from?

What is the time frame you are basing your assumptions on?

JBG


More information about the systemd-devel mailing list