Hi, again !<br>I've managed to apply the patches and fixed all conflicts, modified DBus and Udev and the problem persists regarding the abstract socket namespace. Mainly I think there is a DBus problem.<br>Here's my boot output :<br>
<br>[ 18.750000] Freeing init memory: 152K<br>[ 19.400000] systemd[1]: systemd 8 running in system mode. (+PAM +LIBWRAP -AUDIT -SELINUX +IPV6 -SYSVINIT)<br>[ 19.440000] systemd[1]: /sbin/modprobe failed with error code 1.<br>
[ 19.450000] systemd[1]: No hostname configured.<br>[ 19.460000] systemd[1]: Set hostname to <localhost>.<br>[ 19.470000] systemd[1]: Netlink failure for request 2: Operation not supported<br>[ 19.490000] systemd[1]: Failed to configure loopback device: Operation not supported<br>
[ 19.510000] systemd[1]: Failed to create private D-Bus server: Operating system does not support abstract socket namespace<br>[ 19.540000] systemd[1]: Failed to allocate manager object: Input/output error<br>[ 19.560000] systemd-cgroups-agent[672]: Failed to get D-Bus connection: Operating system does not support abstract socket namespace<br>
<br>Any ideas ?<br><br>Best !<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Cristian Axenie <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:cristian.axenie@gmail.com">cristian.axenie@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">The patches aren't applying correctly ! For what version of systemd were extracted? <br>
<br>Best !<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:barbieri@profusion.mobi" target="_blank">barbieri@profusion.mobi</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Cristian Axenie<br>
<div><<a href="mailto:cristian.axenie@gmail.com" target="_blank">cristian.axenie@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
</div><div>> TIA for the patch. I would like to see this working. Where should the patch<br>
> be available?<br>
<br>
</div>just sent them to mail list:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2010-September/000272.html" target="_blank">http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2010-September/000272.html</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2010-September/000273.html" target="_blank">http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2010-September/000273.html</a><br>
<br>
while they should not depend on each other, the way build.h is done<br>
the patches do depend... or you just apply ipv6 patch and fix the<br>
conflict, it is pretty simple.<br>
<div><br>
<br>
> As for the systemd unit dir in dbus setup it is present and I am now adding<br>
> it to udev configuration.<br>
<br>
</div>yeah, my system did not work properly until i did that.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
</font><div><div></div><div>Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri<br>
<a href="http://profusion.mobi" target="_blank">http://profusion.mobi</a> embedded systems<br>
--------------------------------------<br>
MSN: <a href="mailto:barbieri@gmail.com" target="_blank">barbieri@gmail.com</a><br>
Skype: gsbarbieri<br>
Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>