<div class="gmail_extra">Thank you very much to all. <div class="gmail_quote">2012/4/25 Bill Nottingham <<a href="mailto:notting@redhat.com" target="_blank">notting@redhat.com</a>> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> <div class="im">Antonio Trande (<a href="mailto:anto.trande@gmail.com">anto.trande@gmail.com</a>) said: > $ systemctl status fedora-storage-init.service > fedora-storage-init.service - Initialize storage subsystems (RAID, LVM, > etc.) > Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/fedora-storage-init.service; > static) > Active: active (exited) since Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:36:30 +0200; 8min > ago > Process: 436 ExecStart=/lib/systemd/fedora-storage-init (code=exited, > status=0/SUCCESS) > CGroup: name=systemd:/system/fedora-storage-init.service > > Therefore, are these services (apparently useless) bonded indirectly to the > local filesystem requests ? </div>They're used for LVM and the various things that go on top of LVM, for filesystems that aren't brought up in the initramfs. Now, there could be a dicussions of storage assembly daemons, incremental assembly, and the fun of devicemapper and LVM in these contexts, but I'm not sure systemd-devel is the proper place for them. Bill </blockquote></div> -- Antonio Trande "Fedora Ambassador" mail: <a style="color:rgb(153,153,153)" href="mailto:sagitter@fedoraproject.org" title="mailto:sagitter@fedoraproject.org" target="_blank">mailto:sagitter@fedoraproject.org</a> Homepage: <a style="color:rgb(153,153,153)" href="http://www.fedora-os.org" title="http://www.computer-legacy.net" target="_blank">http://www.fedora-os.org</a> Sip Address : sip:sagitter AT <a href="http://ekiga.net" target="_blank">ekiga.net</a> <a href="http://jabber.org/" title="http://jabber.org" target="_blank">Jabber</a> :sagitter AT <a style="color:rgb(153,153,153)" href="http://jabber.org" target="_blank">jabber.org</a> GPG Key: 19E6DF27 </div>