<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 04/07/2014 11:09 AM, Susant Sahani
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:53428783.4040806@redhat.com" type="cite">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 04/07/2014 03:13 PM, "Jóhann B.
Guðmundsson" wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:5342735A.6060404@gmail.com" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 04/07/2014 04:35 AM, Susant
Sahani wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:53422B21.90109@redhat.com" type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;">This will be
much nicer if we simply use "ipip" as the kind, rather <br>
than "tunnel". <br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Done ! <br>
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;"> </blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
Hmm...<br>
<br>
I think it got right the first place from a usability
perspective as in kind=tunnel then we need to introduce mode= in
the associated network file as in <br>
</blockquote>
Yes from user perceptive this is nice but few line code more ;)</blockquote>
<br>
I think this is more correct since you are dealing with multiple
types of tunnel so the kind= should specify you are using an tunnel
and then specify what type of tunnel in either .netdev file itself
or .network file<br>
<br>
JBG<br>
</body>
</html>