<div dir="ltr"><div><div>Because for all intents and purposes it's effectively still a user instance, just having its own PID namespace isn't cause --system behaviors like disabling systemctl exit for example.<br><br></div><div>Preventing exit from PID 1 makes sense when you're going to panic the kernel, but doesn't --user imply otherwise?<br><br></div><div>Cheers,<br>Vito Caputo<br></div></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Lennart Poettering <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lennart@poettering.net" target="_blank">lennart@poettering.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On Thu, 06.11.14 16:26, Vito Caputo (<a href="mailto:vito.caputo@coreos.com">vito.caputo@coreos.com</a>) wrote:<br>
<br>
> Imagine running systemd --user post-CLONE_NEWPID to manage services in the<br>
> new namespace.<br>
<br>
</span>But why not run it as --system then?<br>
<br>
Not following...<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
Lennart<br>
<br>
--<br>
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>