<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/20/2014 06:27 PM, Reindl Harald
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:546E32A5.5080608@thelounge.net" type="cite"><br>
<br>
what you asked don't matter since this is a <b
class="moz-txt-star"><span class="moz-txt-tag">*</span>developer
list<span class="moz-txt-tag">*</span></b> and so no place where
a RHEL customer with support is expected to jump blindly and try
unsupported packages
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Right which makes this not the place to ask for this either. (
should be asked in downstream community's surrounding RHEL and it's
clones )<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:546E32A5.5080608@thelounge.net" type="cite">
<br>
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;">Red Hat should be
supplying it's own QA resources to test it's own and
<br>
upcoming RHEL product releases instead of be reaching out to the
<br>
community <b class="moz-txt-star"><span class="moz-txt-tag">*</span>to
do it for them<span class="moz-txt-tag">*</span></b> and
leach of it + he does not mention, if
<br>
you intend on testing this on RHEL if it breaks your RHEL
support
<br>
contract or not ( which most likely it does ) hence the question
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
no idea from where your personal vendetta against Redhat is coming
(not only in that response, over years, everywhere) but why don't
you just ignore anything containing the company name?
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
My personal vendetta against Red Hat spurs from their attitude and
repeated misuse of contributors time in projects like Fedora but
that's irrelevant here. <br>
<br>
Encase you somehow missed it, the systemd project has been heavinly
criticized for being a Red Hat only project and it's members heavily
flamed publicly due to that and it makes no wonder if people get
that notion when RHEL employees treat it like internal company
project. <br>
<br>
JBG<br>
</body>
</html>