<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Lennart Poettering <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lennart@poettering.net" target="_blank">lennart@poettering.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On Fri, 23.10.15 14:03, Mantas Mikulėnas (<a href="mailto:grawity@gmail.com">grawity@gmail.com</a>) wrote:<br>
<br>
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Lennart Poettering <<a href="mailto:lennart@poettering.net">lennart@poettering.net</a>><br>
> wrote:<br>
><br>
> > On Fri, 23.10.15 00:59, Reindl Harald (<a href="mailto:h.reindl@thelounge.net">h.reindl@thelounge.net</a>) wrote:<br>
> ><br>
> > ><br>
> > ><br>
> > > Am 23.10.2015 um 00:39 schrieb Ivan Shapovalov:<br>
> > > >On 2015-10-22 at 23:12 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:<br>
> > > >>[...]<br>
> > > >>and why not simply "timedatectl -H user@host[:port]" since host:port<br>
> > > >>is<br>
> > > >>a well known protocol agnostic way to specify a non-default port?<br>
> > > ><br>
> > > >Because the syntax of -H parameter is "[user@]host[:container]"<br>
> > > >and it does not allow specifying an explicit port number.<br>
> > ><br>
> > > [user@]host[:container][:port]<br>
> > > [user@]host[:port][:container]<br>
> > ><br>
> > > nothing unusual<br>
> ><br>
> > Nope. The idea is that<br>
> ><br>
> > foo:bar:baz:waldo<br>
> ><br>
> > is kind of "path": connect to host "foo", enter its container "bar",<br>
> > and from there connect to "bar"'s container "baz" and then further<br>
> > down into "baz"'s container "waldo"... Containers are stackable after<br>
> > all.<br>
> ><br>
><br>
> The usual path separator would be "/" or "!", then?<br>
<br>
</span>I have never seen "!" for this. (or well, maybe uucp, but christ...)<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yeah, I was referring to UUCP, since it's the same kind of hop-by-hop source-routing.</div><div><br></div><div>(Admittedly, ":" was used the same way in Berknet...)</div><div><br></div><div>Though, wouldn't containers just run sshd themselves? Or is this mostly for very-lightweight things?</div></div><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr">Mantas Mikulėnas <<a href="mailto:grawity@gmail.com" target="_blank">grawity@gmail.com</a>></div></div>
</div></div>