Is this going to be in place for 2.16?<br><br>Dan<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 6/29/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Rodney Dawes</b> <<a href="mailto:dobey@novell.com">dobey@novell.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Yes. Apps should ship their own app icons.<br><br>And yes, we are fixing gnome-icon-theme to follow the naming spec. And<br>yes, the rest of GNOME will be updated to follow the spec as well.<br><br>-- dobey<br><br><br>On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 12:14 +1000, Jones Lee wrote:
<br>> Hi there guys,<br>> Yesterday, I was mucking around gnome cvs and I found out there are<br>> some changes with gnome-icon-theme. Some particular apps icons now<br>> have been removed such as xchat (just recently) and the rename to
<br>> freedesktop's icon-naming-spec of wallpaper changer icon. So can some<br>> one clear this confusion of mine? Is GNOME following strictly the<br>> freedesktop icon-naming-spec? If so, will all the current names be
<br>> changed according to icon-naming-spec? And will there be a deprecation<br>> of specific GNOME apps icon (let programs ship the icon itself)? I<br>> know this is not much related to Tango but at least it's related to
<br>> icon-naming-spec.<br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Tango-artists mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Tango-artists@lists.freedesktop.org">Tango-artists@lists.freedesktop.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/tango-artists">
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/tango-artists</a><br></blockquote></div><br>