<div>... speaking of which, I recently came accross such discrepancies. To which of the two projects should I file a bug ? (both ?)  </div> <div>Frédéric</div> <div>2007/3/28, Rodney Dawes <<a href="mailto:dobey@novell.com">dobey@novell.com</a>>: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 14:47 +0200, Mathias Brodala wrote: > Hello Hylke. > > Hylke Bons, 28.03.2007 13:10: > >> On Wednesday 28 March 2007 11:34, Mathias Brodala wrote: > >>> for i in *.svg;do convert -resize 48x48 "$i" > >>> "../48x48/${i/\.svg$/.png}";done > >> See attached png for the result... > > Replace the imagemagick command with the inkscape export command. Don't > > know the exact command but you can look it up with "inkscape --help". > > Yes, you are right; Inkscape does this a lot better. Thanks for the tip. Using the "rsvg" command will give you a better idea of what the icons will actually look like in GTK+/GNOME though, as librsvg is what provides the SVG rendering there. It's also useful for finding the discrepancies between rsvg and Inkscape, so we can fix bugs as appropriate. -- dobey _______________________________________________ Tango-artists mailing list <a href="mailto:Tango-artists@lists.freedesktop.org">Tango-artists@lists.freedesktop.org</a> <a href="http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/tango-artists">http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/tango-artists </a> </blockquote></div>