[Bug 24905] undraft Conn.I.ServicePoint, Chan.I.ServicePoint (emergency call identification)

[bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24905

Simon McVittie <simon.mcvittie at collabora.co.uk> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Emergency call              |undraft
                   |identification              |Conn.I.ServicePoint,
                   |                            |Chan.I.ServicePoint
                   |                            |(emergency call
                   |                            |identification)
                URL|                            |http://people.freedesktop.o
                   |                            |rg/~smcv/telepathy-spec-ser
                   |                            |vicepoint/spec/
  Status Whiteboard|review-, minor changes.     |undraft in 0.19.7?
         AssignedTo|telepathy-bugs at lists.freede |simon.mcvittie at collabora.co
                   |sktop.org                   |.uk

--- Comment #12 from Simon McVittie <simon.mcvittie at collabora.co.uk> 2010-06-11 05:57:49 PDT ---
I've had another look at this and made some editorial changes. With those
changes, I think it's ready to undraft.

Gitweb:
http://git.collabora.co.uk/?p=user/smcv/telepathy-spec-smcv.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/servicepoint
HTML:
http://people.freedesktop.org/~smcv/telepathy-spec-servicepoint/spec/

> > • For documentation purposes there should be a TpSimpleType
> > for URN strings, so we can use that as the type for ServicePoint.
> 
> Not really, since the string content for Service is intentionally opaque. The
> URN example is just an example. Various protocols might have completely
> different semantics for this field.
> 
> That said, I did add URN simple type, since it improves docs a bit and can
> probably be used elsewhere in the spec where we're dealing with URNs (if
> anywhere).

I've removed this simple-type, since either its name or its documentation is
incorrect (it's documented as urn:service:*, but its name ought to be for
urn:*). I don't think having a simple-type adds anything to the documentation
here, because it's only referenced in one place, and that's "optional" - I
moved the RFC reference to appear in the one place where the simple-type was
referenced, which I think is equally good.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.