Hi, I'm afraid I don't see much benefit in the change. It just makes the signals harder to construct and iterate. However, some clarification to the spec could be added regarding the issue, if it's misleading. Br, Olli Salli <div>On 9/18/06, Daniel d'Andrada Tenório de Carvalho <<a href="mailto:daniel.carvalho@indt.org.br">daniel.carvalho@indt.org.br</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin-top: 0; margin-right: 0; margin-bottom: 0; margin-left: 0; margin-left: 0.80ex; border-left-color: #cccccc; border-left-width: 1px; border-left-style: solid; padding-left: 1ex"> Hi everyone, The some method signatures of the current Connection.Interface.Capabilities are looking somewhat crude. They currently use a tuple (contact_handle, channel_type, type_generic_flags, type_specific_flags). I'm proposing using (contact_handle, array(channel_type, type_generic_flags, type_specific_flags)) since each handle may advertise several channel types. The current specification "just works", of course, but its simplistic approach can be an issue (e.g. misleading). Attached to this e-mail is a patch to solve that. Regards, Daniel d'Andrada T. de Carvalho - INdT _______________________________________________ Telepathy mailing list <a href="mailto:Telepathy@lists.freedesktop.org">Telepathy@lists.freedesktop.org</a> <a href="http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/telepathy">http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/telepathy </a> </blockquote></div>