<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 13:40, Danielle Madeley <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:danielle.madeley@collabora.co.uk">danielle.madeley@collabora.co.uk</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">

<div class="im">On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 09:38 +0000, Will Thompson wrote:<br>
<br>
&gt; They don&#39;t provide the element which tells you it&#39;s an upgrade? The PDF<br>
&gt; on &lt;<a href="http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22768" target="_blank">http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22768</a>&gt; suggests they&#39;re<br>
&gt; supposed to send &lt;continue/&gt;, but without thread=&#39;&#39;.<br>
<br>
</div>It seems they do not, from my tests:<br>
<br>
        * message xmlns=&#39;jabber:client&#39; from=&#39;<a href="mailto:private-chat-dc9053c4-dc12-4615-8a01-62e06582b197@groupchat.google.com">private-chat-dc9053c4-dc12-4615-8a01-62e06582b197@groupchat.google.com</a>&#39; to=&#39;<a href="mailto:danielle.madeley@collabora.co.uk">danielle.madeley@collabora.co.uk</a>&#39; jid=&#39;<a href="mailto:danni.m@gmail.com">danni.m@gmail.com</a>&#39;<br>


            * x xmlns=&#39;<a href="http://jabber.org/protocol/muc#user" target="_blank">http://jabber.org/protocol/muc#user</a>&#39;<br>
                * invite from=&#39;<a href="http://dannielle.meyer@gmail.com/gmail.24E97497" target="_blank">dannielle.meyer@gmail.com/gmail.24E97497</a>&#39;<br>
                    * reason<br>
                        &quot;You&#39;ve been invited to this chat room!&quot;<br>
            * x xmlns=&#39;google:nosave&#39; value=&#39;disabled&#39;<br>
            * record xmlns=&#39;<a href="http://jabber.org/protocol/archive" target="_blank">http://jabber.org/protocol/archive</a>&#39; otr=&#39;false&#39;<br>
<br>
So no, it seems that they don&#39;t comply with their own spec even. :o(<br></blockquote><div><br><br>It sounds to me like they&#39;re not continuing old conversation (despite UI behaving like they are), they&#39;re opening a completely new one. Too often programmers work around specs instead of complying with them.<br>

<br>When did last version of Gtalk come out anyways?<br> </div></div>-- <br>Regards,<br><br>Ivan Vučica <br><br>