<FONT size=2 face="Default Sans Serif,Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><DIV>Thanks Dannielle for this again very interesting information! </DIV><DIV> </DIV><DIV>I copy direct also to Cesar who initiated this discussion (and who was accidently dropped from the send list for the previous round) and to Peter Korn and some other friends in the AEGIS project group. We won't be able to take on any development around this within AEGIS, but it will be interesting to keep this in mind in the planning for follow-up actions further on.</DIV><DIV> </DIV><DIV>Cheers, </DIV><DIV>Mats </DIV><DIV><DIV><BR></DIV><FONT color=#990099>-----Danielle Madeley <danielle.madeley@collabora.co.uk> skrev: -----<BR><BR></FONT><BLOCKQUOTE style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"><FONT size=2 face="Default Monospace,Courier New,Courier,monospace">On Fri, 2011-10-28 at 23:19 +0200, Mats Lundälv wrote:<BR><BR>> Thanks both for this interesting information about the preconditions<BR>> for graphics in IM! The XEP-0231<BR>> specs look quite promising (to an amateur in the techy field, as I<BR>> am)! <BR><BR>To me, this seems like the way forward. It's worth noting that Empathy<BR>is modular, and so a different chat component could be used to provide a<BR>palette of images, or something, for people who wish to chat this way,<BR>which would prepare a message using inline graphics that any user could<BR>view.<BR><BR>This would require some work in Telepathy-Gabble and Empathy to support<BR>rich-text messages (which we want to do eventually anyway).<BR><BR>> Another question then: Is there any support currently for Ruby<BR>> Annotation  in any of these IM protocols? <BR>> If not; Are there any discussions going on concerning this afayk? <BR><BR>Not as far as I know, however, this is an XML specification (as is<BR>XMPP), and XMPP is designed to be extensible, so it would probably not<BR>be too difficult to draft a XEP (extension to XMPP) to support it. We've<BR>implemented our own feature drafts in Telepathy-Gabble before (Tubes,<BR>Muji), so I don't think another would hurt. It would allow two Telepathy<BR>users to chat together (assuming their UIs understood the message type).<BR>Other chat programs could choose to implement the XEP too.<BR><BR>--danni<BR><BR>-- <BR>Danielle Madeley<BR>Software Developer, Collabora Ltd.                  Melbourne, Australia<BR><BR>www.collabora.co.uk<BR><BR></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE><BR></DIV></FONT>