<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - uim-pref, uim-dict and uim-input-pad-ja should have single instance"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39246#c3">Comment # 3</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - uim-pref, uim-dict and uim-input-pad-ja should have single instance"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39246">bug 39246</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:nogu.dev@gmail.com" title="Muneyuki Noguchi <nogu.dev@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Muneyuki Noguchi</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=39246#c2">comment #2</a>)
<span class="quote">> thank you for your checking.
> but uim-dict and uim-input-pad-ja should do too.</span >
Why do you think that uim-dict and uim-input-pad-ja should have a limitation on
number of instances?
Multiple instances of uim-pref and uim-im-switcher make user confused because
the configurations which can be set by uim-pref and uim-im-switcher is single.
But uim-dict and uim-input-pad-ja aren't related to any configurations of uim.
IMO, we should restrict number of instances only when there is good reason to
do.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>