<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - Weston should exit when run on KMS without weston-launch"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60926#c1">Comment # 1</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - Weston should exit when run on KMS without weston-launch"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60926">bug 60926</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:ullysses.a.eoff@intel.com" title="U. Artie Eoff <ullysses.a.eoff@intel.com>"> <span class="fn">U. Artie Eoff</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=60926#c0">comment #0</a>)
<span class="quote">> Currently, when someone runs weston on KMS/DRM without weston-launch, they
> usually have no keyboard / mouse permissions, which generally ends up
> requiring a reboot.
>
> So weston should detect being run on KMS/DRM without weston-launch, and exit.</span >
I don't use weston-launch in the realm of my testing activities and prefer not
to. And I've never had the issue that you've described.
It seems you're trying to solve the issue from the wrong direction... shouldn't
weston just detect the permission problems instead of forcing a hard
multi-directional relationship on weston-launch? Having weston check if
weston-launch was used to run it doesn't seem to make sense to me (i.e. why not
just have weston take on the responsibilities of weston-launch in that case?).</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>