<html>
    <head>
      <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
    </head>
    <body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:ppaalanen@gmail.com" title="Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Pekka Paalanen</span></a>
</span> changed
              <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEW "
   title="NEW --- - wl_shm_pool_resize crashes weston"
   href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74632">bug 74632</a>
        <br>
             <table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
          <tr>
            <th>What</th>
            <th>Removed</th>
            <th>Added</th>
          </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Component</td>
           <td>weston
           </td>
           <td>wayland
           </td>
         </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
            <b><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEW "
   title="NEW --- - wl_shm_pool_resize crashes weston"
   href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74632#c1">Comment # 1</a>
              on <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEW "
   title="NEW --- - wl_shm_pool_resize crashes weston"
   href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74632">bug 74632</a>
              from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:ppaalanen@gmail.com" title="Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Pekka Paalanen</span></a>
</span></b>
        <pre>Yikes. Yes, the client behavior you describe is an application bug, in that it
is reusing/destroying the buffer's storage without waiting for a
wl_buffer.release, right? Also the client should destroy the wl_buffer before
invalidating its storage.

But this client bug also exposes a weston bug in that weston really should not
crash here.

Actually this needs to be fixed in libwayland-server, because the
wl_shm_pool_resize is handled there. I'd prefer to send a fatal error to the
client immediately when a resize attempts invalidate the storage of any
existing wl_buffer, rather than check on use. We may also want to add a note of
this in the protocol spec.

A simpler alternative would be to specify that resize must never make the size
smaller. I am unsure which one would be preferable.

Therefore I am changing the component to "wayland", on a quick glance I do not
see anything needing fixing in Weston code.

Thanks for reporting this.

(I'm only analyzing this one for now, not assigning it to myself.)</pre>
        </div>
      </p>
      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
      
      <ul>
          <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>