<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - wayland: Use g_get_prgname as the xdg surface application id"
href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746435#c7">Comment # 7</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - wayland: Use g_get_prgname as the xdg surface application id"
href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746435">bug 746435</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a href="page.cgi?id=describeuser.html&login=jadahl%40gmail.com" title="Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Jonas Ådahl</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Matthias Clasen from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=746435#c5">comment #5</a>)
<span class="quote">> One thing that plays into this is that the identity desktop file basename ==
> busname is only mandatory for applications which have DBusActivatable=true
> in the desktop files, while desktop file basename == application id should
> always hold. </span >
So in other words, for those applications that doesn't have
DBusActivatable=true, their .desktop files either need to be renamed, or they
should change the string passed when creating the GtkApplication object?
<span class="quote">>
> Another thing to notice is that under X, the application id is not actually
> needed on the bus, from what I can see, since we also set
> _GTK_UNIQUE_BUS_NAME as a window property, and that seems to be what the
> shell uses (e.g. gucharmap does not take org.gnome.Charmap as a well-known
> name, yet its appmenu works fine).</span ></pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>