<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Cannot rotate input touchscreen with Xorg + libinput" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90007#c4">Comment # 4</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Cannot rotate input touchscreen with Xorg + libinput" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90007">bug 90007</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:eric.brunet@lps.ens.fr" title="Éric Brunet <eric.brunet@lps.ens.fr>"> Éric Brunet</a> <pre>Yes logically speaking, as it is a property from the X server, it should maybe be in xorg.conf. On the other hand, redundancy in documentation is good. As a user, I have learned how to rotate in "man evdev", and in "man wacom", I expected to learn how to rotate in "man libinput"; I filled a bug when I didn't find the info! By the way, out of curiosity, I looked in libinput source at the explanations in function evdev_device_calibrate. From what I could make out, the "Coordinate Transformation Matrix" and the "libinput Calibration Matrix" both do exactly the same thing. Shouldn't one of them be removed while libinput is still in development and the ABI is not completely frozen ?</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>