<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_ASSIGNED " title="ASSIGNED - Double tap not always recognized" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90172#c20">Comment # 20</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_ASSIGNED " title="ASSIGNED - Double tap not always recognized" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90172">bug 90172</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:lisec.velimir@gmail.com" title="Velimir Lisec <lisec.velimir@gmail.com>"> Velimir Lisec</a> <pre>(In reply to Peter Hutterer from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=90172#c19">comment #19</a>) > Not a bad idea re:tap to end drag timeout and increasing that timeout in > general, please file that as separate bugs though, it's too hard to keep > track of everything otherwise. Will do. > true but that assumes no delay whatsoever. depending on what the system is > up to, there can be a delay between the timer triggering and us actually > processing the event. Which is, I think, the reason you had a 200ms delay in > one of your recordings. And note that you labelled that recording as "normal > speed", shortening the timeout would've missed the first tap. So for > double-tap I think a longer + slightly shorter combination may be better. But what I don't understand is why was the tap from that recording recognized? Because DEFAULT_TAP_TIMEOUT was set to 180 ms, if the delay is 200 ms, it shouldn't have been recognized as a tap, but as a pointer move.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>