<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - warnings when starting drag from GtkEntries"
href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=748763#c10">Comment # 10</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - warnings when starting drag from GtkEntries"
href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=748763">bug 748763</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a href="page.cgi?id=describeuser.html&login=mclasen%40redhat.com" title="Matthias Clasen <mclasen@redhat.com>"> <span class="fn">Matthias Clasen</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Carlos Garnacho from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=748763#c9">comment #9</a>)
<span class="quote">> Sure, redraws/resizes are fine, let me remark "icon window" :). What I'm
> trying to avoid here is multiple calls to gtk_drag_set_icon_window(), which
> destroys the former DnD icon GdkWindow/surface. This function is currently
> at the core of every other gtk_drag_set_icon* call...</span >
Ah, I misunderstood.
<span class="quote">> About the general case, I wonder if this is the way to go, and we:
> - ensure surface/pixbuf/stock APIs don't end up replacing the entire icon
> window every time they're called</span >
That sounds like a good idea.
<span class="quote">> - Document gtk_drag_set_icon_widget() as "one time call on ::drag-begin, no
> way back to surface/pixbuf/stock icons, you are free to replace contents,
> but don't destroy"</span >
I assume in practice that is how it is used anyway ?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>