<html> <head> <base href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Epiphany displays incorrect name in gnome-shell app menu" href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=752258#c20">Comment # 20</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Epiphany displays incorrect name in gnome-shell app menu" href="https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=752258">bug 752258</a> from <a href="page.cgi?id=describeuser.html&login=jadahl%40gmail.com" title="Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>"> Jonas Ådahl</a> <pre>So, according to Jasper in <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=752258#c15">comment 15</a> "prgname" should be (or is completely valid to be) the name of the binary, and according to Michael in <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=752258#c16">comment 16</a> "prgname" should always be the basename of the .desktop file. For the org.gnome.gedit.desktop case, *should* the prgname be "gedit" or "org.gnome.gedit"? If it should be "gedit" then we cannot use prgname to set the xdg_surface app_id since it should mean that for D-Bus activatable applications always set the wrong ID. Using the GtkApplication ID isn't very good either, since it'd be wrong for all non-D-Bus-activatable applications, but at least it isn't incorrect forever. If it should be "org.gnome.gedit" it'd be helpful to fix the documentation of glib (not counting a wiki page) to say that applications need to set the "prgname" to the basename of the .desktop file. In this case we can use prgname to set the xdg_surface app_id (i.e. revert the patch and apply the original rejected patch from the same bug) and also fix all the applications that doesn't yet do this. So my question is, should "prgname" *always* be the .desktop file basename?</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>