<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_REOPENED " title="REOPENED - Libinput 0.19 and 0.20 ignore POINTINGSTICK_CONST_ACCEL" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91369#c18">Comment # 18</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_REOPENED " title="REOPENED - Libinput 0.19 and 0.20 ignore POINTINGSTICK_CONST_ACCEL" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91369">bug 91369</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:peter.hutterer@who-t.net" title="Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>"> Peter Hutterer</a> <pre>Created <a href="attachment.cgi?id=117471" name="attach_117471" title="rendering of the acceleration function">attachment 117471</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=117471&action=edit" title="rendering of the acceleration function">[details]</a> rendering of the acceleration function this is your acceleration function in comparison to the linear one. For a 1000dpi trackpoint (i.e. one without a CONST_ACCEL, the function is identical to the linear one). For a low-dpi one, here a 400dpi one (const accel 2.5) the low-speed profile is the same but it accelerates faster and higher once it hits the threshold. Interesting approach, I notice however that the pointer is still very hard to control, especially once I put any serious pressure down (e.g. when I want to cross the screen), the pointer immediately shoots off way too fast. I think my main problem is the threshold, I wonder if a more linear approach would work better.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>