<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Add rendernode support to headless-GL backend" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83985#c5">Comment # 5</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Add rendernode support to headless-GL backend" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83985">bug 83985</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:ppaalanen@gmail.com" title="Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen@gmail.com>"> Pekka Paalanen</a> <pre>(In reply to Pekka Paalanen from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=83985#c4">comment #4</a>) > Oh, I suppose our gl-renderer API does not account for rendering into an FBO > off-screen. It always requires an EGLNativeWindowType to create an > EGLSurface for. Do you know if there is anything we could pass in with > surfaceless to get a working EGLSurface, or would it always force us to use > an FBO because the EGLSurface is a dummy? Hrm, it being called "surfaceless" and all, I would assume you cannot even create an EGLsurface to begin with, which leaves no other option than to use FBOs. So the alternative to GBM platform would be to use an FBO, which means extending the gl-renderer API to allow that. So, let's just use GBM for now.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>