<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Building Weston (1.8.92) for Raspberry Pi with EGL enabled fails due to missing `libdrm` dependency"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91884#c6">Comment # 6</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Building Weston (1.8.92) for Raspberry Pi with EGL enabled fails due to missing `libdrm` dependency"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91884">bug 91884</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:daniel@fooishbar.org" title="Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>"> <span class="fn">Daniel Stone</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Pekka Paalanen from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=91884#c3">comment #3</a>)
<span class="quote">> You're right, using those proprietary libs is the only applicable use case
> for your request. Interesting to hear someone is still actually using them
> with Weston.</span >
In theory, someone could also be using a proprietary driver on a non-RPi system
(Mali, PVR/IMG, Vivante, NVIDIA) which doesn't support libdrm. That being said,
I don't think requiring libdrm itself is too bad, as we don't require its
functionality to be present. So I'd tend towards retaining the dependency.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>