<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Building Weston (1.8.92) for Raspberry Pi with EGL enabled fails due to missing `libdrm` dependency" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91884#c7">Comment # 7</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Building Weston (1.8.92) for Raspberry Pi with EGL enabled fails due to missing `libdrm` dependency" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91884">bug 91884</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:deathofathousandpapercuts@gmail.com" title="John Sadler <deathofathousandpapercuts@gmail.com>"> John Sadler</a> <pre>(In reply to Daniel Stone from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=91884#c6">comment #6</a>) > (In reply to Pekka Paalanen from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=91884#c3">comment #3</a>) > > You're right, using those proprietary libs is the only applicable use case > > for your request. Interesting to hear someone is still actually using them > > with Weston. > > In theory, someone could also be using a proprietary driver on a non-RPi > system (Mali, PVR/IMG, Vivante, NVIDIA) which doesn't support libdrm. That > being said, I don't think requiring libdrm itself is too bad, as we don't > require its functionality to be present. So I'd tend towards retaining the > dependency. Hi Daniel, thanks for taking a look. I see your point, but as I'm building for an embedded system I'd rather not add stuff I don't need (and can't use) into my buildroot. It's just another package to track and upgrade as needed. The patch I'm proposing shouldn't change the default behaviour. It just gives the option to remove the libdrm dependency (and gl_renderer itself) if it's not actually needed.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>