<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED - Libinput 0.19 and 0.20 ignore POINTINGSTICK_CONST_ACCEL"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91369#c31">Comment # 31</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED - Libinput 0.19 and 0.20 ignore POINTINGSTICK_CONST_ACCEL"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91369">bug 91369</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:justin.w.xd@gmail.com" title="Justin Wong <justin.w.xd@gmail.com>"> <span class="fn">Justin Wong</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre><span class="quote">> no. the hwdb is not a configuration system, it's a system to store hw-specific properties. </span >
You mean that you wanna hard code for DELL D520 5150 E4300 E6400 E6420 E6410
D810 E7440, and Thinkpad T420 T430 T440 T450 X61 X200 X201 X210 X220 X230 X240
X250? That's horrible!
Of course I can simply submit a 7440 compatible patch, but what about other
devices? Have you tested the code on devices other than T440s or Thinkpad?
<span class="quote">> The main question here is: is this a general requirement for these trackpoints, or just one on your specific laptop? I don't use the trackpoint that much, but I can tell even on the T440s I have it's not ideal - when it kicks in it's way too fast.</span >
I don't know, I can only test on my laptop. But according to
<a href="http://wayland.freedesktop.org/libinput/doc/latest/pointer-acceleration.html">http://wayland.freedesktop.org/libinput/doc/latest/pointer-acceleration.html</a>
Why the accel of a 200DPI only a little bit faster than 400DPI device? I
thought
200DPI should be twice as fast as 400DPI to reach a reasonable speed.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>