<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" /> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Automatically scale windows?" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93315#c10">Comment # 10</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Automatically scale windows?" href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93315">bug 93315</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:fourdan@xfce.org" title="Olivier Fourdan <fourdan@xfce.org>"> Olivier Fourdan</a> <pre>(In reply to Daniel Stone from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=93315#c9">comment #9</a>) > (In reply to Alexander Larsson from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=93315#c8">comment #8</a>) > > Could we run two xwayland instances? first display is lodpi, and second is > > hidpi? Then we have some magic desktop file thing to tell the shell to > > launch hidpi apps on display 2? > > Not without some pretty radical surgery, no. Mutter would need a huge rework > to be a WM across multiple X servers at the same time, as would the XWayland > integration (e.g. to cope with XIDs no longer being unique). Not sure if that'd be workable, but What about 2 screens of the same display then (:0.0 and :0.1)? Each could have its own resolution/size/DPI, and yet map to the same Wayland output.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>