[PATCH] Fix re-entrancy issues in wl_display_iterate().

[Hannu Lyytinen]

On Sat, 2012-04-14 at 12:26 +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> Does something prevent you from using the deferred task pattern
> like upstream uses? By your explanation, it sounds like it would
> achieve exactly the same (you have no other events coming when
> you wait for your callback), and avoid a very fragile design.

Now I checked that thing and yes, it is definitely a lot better way to
solve the problem. Thanks for clarifying and please just ignore the
patch :)

-- 
Hannu Lyytinen
Senior Software Developer, Nomovok Ltd
email: hannu.lyytinen at nomovok.com