Wayland start a new age, when every one can write X server.<br>We can't forget who bring us the new age, the EGL. <br>Yes, if you can get GLcontext on raw framebuffer, then why can't we write X.<br>So, next generation X should be fully hardware independent. <br> X only depends on EGL and some basic system libs.<br>X will no longer have driver as module of built-in, because it is the EGL and kernel that should manage the graphic hardware...<br><br>EGL and DRM makes it possible that X is only a GL program ...... <br> <br>so , I just hope NVIDIA and AMD can provide there hardware's EGL library so that we can start using Wayland right away ....<br><br>currently we just have Mesa's EGL.. too bad .....<br>Hope ubuntu's decision can make some difference ......<br> <br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/11/11 Chris Wilson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:chris@chris-wilson.co.uk">chris@chris-wilson.co.uk</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"> <div class="im">On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 17:08:02 +0800, Justin Lee <<a href="mailto:justinlee5455@gmail.com">justinlee5455@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br> > It will be good if similar benchmark could be observed in Wayland. I<br> > expect Wayland will have the same order of performance as cairo-drm<br> > although it depends on hardware and driver.<br> <br> </div>Yes Wayland will be as fast as a well written DDX.<br> -Chris<br> <font color="#888888"><br> --<br> Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre<br> </font><div><div></div><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br> wayland-devel mailing list<br> <a href="mailto:wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org">wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org</a><br> <a href="http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel" target="_blank">http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel</a><br> </div></div></blockquote></div><br>