<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Daniel Stone <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:daniel@fooishbar.org">daniel@fooishbar.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi,<br>
<br>
As reiterated earlier, there is already support for displaying on an X<br>
server within the Wayland compositor, and the reverse of having an X<br>
server display X applications within a Wayland session. I also fully<br>
expect remote-display capabilities will be developed for Wayland which<br>
will be a great deal faster than X11, as X11 requires an insane amount<br>
of network bandwidth to use as a bandaid over its complete lack of<br>
client/server/window-manager synchronisation, and also requires a lot<br>
of roundtrips which are extremely expensive and make the performance<br>
of your entire session bound on some very unfortunate multiple of the<br>
link latency.<br><br></blockquote><div><br>So, I will be able to display wayland session, or did you mean individual wayland apps, onto an X server, over an X protocol connection, to a standard X server? If it is an entire wayland session tht can be displayed over X protocol to a standard X server, that would be sufficient, as long as the wayland session can be displayed only to the X server and does not have to be displayed to real hardware at the same time. <br>
</div></div>