<div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im"> </div>Ok, that seems sufficient, thanks. For a bonus, could you still explain what this FPS count actually measures? Something like this: it measures how often a very simple GL program can show new content. This is limited by the monitors' refresh rates, system load, compositor performance, and finally the program's own performance. "show new content" is a hint, that it does not measure rendering speed nor "Wayland speed". I wrote monitors in plural, because having the gears surface on multiple monitors simultaneously might limit the FPS to the sum of the individual refresh rates, depending a bit. I'm not sure how Weston behaves currently. Heh, that would be a nice headline: "Adding more monitors in clone mode speeds up Wayland!" ;-) Thanks, pq </blockquote><div> This message is indeed very important as many users get confused very easily, thinking that the popular 'gears' implementation is a direct measure of their graphics drivers and/or system/platform performance. This is clearly not the case and the message should reflect that, while explaining what these numbers actually mean. Scott </div></div>