<html> <head> <style></style></head> <body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'> <div>> Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 00:59:44 -0700 > From: bryce@osg.samsung.com > To: ren_zokuken01@hotmail.com > CC: wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: Re: Can speed of Wayland overtake the toll of emulating X? > > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 12:43:53AM -0700, R . wrote: > > OK, so my test drive hasn't really been "fair", as I only tested Weston and not other Wayland implementations. But if you guys could suggest a less buggy and faster implementation, then please what is it? It'll save me the time, rather than trying each and every one. > > > > Everything's under heavy development right now, so any comparison done > today isn't going to hold true in a month. > > In addition to Weston, EFL and GNOME both seem to be pretty far along in > implementation. KDE seems to be on track as well. At this stage my > guess is all of them need thorough testing. If you want to be an early > adopter my advice would be to pick whichever one personally interests > you, and plan to set aside a chunk of time each week to file bug > reports. Be scientific in your bug reports, learn what log files the > given D-E likes, and be prompt with follow up for re-test requests. > You'll be helping contribute to the improvement of that D-E, while > simultaneously gaining better stability and performance for your > specific hardware. > > Bryce I was actually hoping that at least one of them would have an intensively modular system, so that codebase can be easily re-targetted to Wayland (optimizing it then wouldn't be that far behind). But, I was wrong... I guess my HummingBoard is fast enough as a development platform... > > > From: ren_zokuken01@hotmail.com > > To: wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > > Subject: Can speed of Wayland overtake the toll of emulating X? > > Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 00:04:42 -0700 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So I've been test driving Wayland and it has more lag than LXDE (understandably), and, of course, will get better... But, I'm more concerned with backwards compatibility (and speed) with old X clients (until, of course they eventually, port to Wayland). Since XWayland is another layer, so will inherently will add toll, but can that be completely overtaken by the lightness and speed of Wayland? I really need a minimalistic and fast desktop environment, you see... > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > wayland-devel mailing list > > wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel > </div> </div></body> </html>