[Xcb] a question about request and reply
Vincent.Torri at iecn.u-nancy.fr
Tue Dec 13 13:26:19 PST 2005
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Jamey Sharp wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 07:16:45PM +0100, Vincent Torri wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Barton C Massey wrote:
> > > Yes, the reply is currently queued until you force the
> > > cookie, so you'll leak memory. Nothing worse. :-)
good. I know what I have to do, now.
> > > It seems to me pretty straightforward to add
> > > XCBDiscardCookie(GenericCookie) to the interface.
> > there is a GenericCookie ? I've only see VoidCookie and all the others
> > corresponding to the requests. I think that such a structure should be
> > added.
> There isn't a GenericCookie, and I don't want to add one. Functions like
> XCBWaitForReply just take the 'unsigned int' from inside the cookie
> structure. I don't want to encourage casting structures any more than I
> have to.
so, instead of using a generic cookie, it's better to pass the sequence
(the unsigned int) directly ?
More information about the Xcb