[Xcb] Are the util-common-m4 submodules relative on purpose?

[Gaetan Nadon]

On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 08:03 -0400, Peter Harris wrote:

> Draconian firewalls.
> 
> The git protocol is far more efficient than the dumb http protocol, so
> that's what you want to use if you can. But every time I see an open
> source project announce a git-only URL, someone comes out of the
> woodwork asking for http to be enabled.
> 

Thanks. I am a bit confused. Don't we all use:

        [remote "origin"]
        	url = git://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/xorg/xserver/

(unless we use ssh, of course).

Those with such a firewall also have to somehow use a non git url
for all of their xorg modules?

When I type this git url in the web browser, I get an error:

        [...]because the protocol (git) isn't associated with any program
        

I always wanted to ask someone about this...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xcb/attachments/20110324/85678da9/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xcb/attachments/20110324/85678da9/attachment.pgp>