In order to win the performance, I would like to make use of round-trip delays to get work done in gdk-xcb firstly, which is impossible with Xlib in general. Also the small library and transparent thread safety are the reason of xcb-porting. These features have been illuminated a lot.
<br><br>Jianjun<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 11/8/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Ross Burton</b> <<a href="mailto:ross@burtonini.com">ross@burtonini.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 15:28 -0200, Johan Dahlin wrote:<br>> >> Anyway, I'd appreciate any advice/pointers you could provide, poking<br>> >> at the gdk-xcb backends.<br>> ><br>> > Leaves me wondering, what do you see as the benefit of the XCB backends
<br>> > for the Gtk+ stack?<br>><br>> I'd say thread-safety.<br><br>And the ability to not link to libX11, which is relatively huge.<br><br>Ros<br>--<br>Ross Burton mail: <a href="mailto:ross@burtonini.com">
ross@burtonini.com</a><br> jabber: <a href="mailto:ross@burtonini.com">ross@burtonini.com</a><br> www: <a href="http://www.burtonini.com./">http://www.burtonini.com./
</a><br> PGP Fingerprint: 1A21 F5B0 D8D0 CFE3 81D4 E25A 2D09 E447 D0B4 33DF<br><br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>gtk-devel-list mailing list<br><a href="mailto:gtk-devel-list@gnome.org">gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
</a><br><a href="http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list">http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list</a><br><br><br><br></blockquote></div><br>