<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.26.0">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 18:50 +0200, Arnaud Fontaine wrote:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">I completely agree with you on the fact that it's not a problem at all</FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">to require Autoconf >= 2.62 for libxcb and xcb-util, and that's why I</FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">have already put this macro in util-common-m4 repository for xcb-util</FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">libraries and as soon as I have some time, I will do the same for</FONT></TT><BR>
<TT><FONT COLOR="#1a1a1a">libxcb.</FONT></TT><BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
I have taken notes from the discussion here, which was not in vain. It's the first time<BR>
in a year I hear someone coming loud and clear in favor of the separation between <BR>
development-git and distro-tarball build scenario. I agree with Vincent, I am just not<BR>
in a position to impose it. On the other hand I can propose a more dynamic plan<BR>
to upgrade the toolchain so it comes sooner rather than later.<BR>
<BR>
Gaetan
</BODY>
</HTML>