<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - Deadlock in _XReply when recursing through _XSeqSyncFunction"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59361#c3">Comment # 3</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW --- - Deadlock in _XReply when recursing through _XSeqSyncFunction"
href="https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59361">bug 59361</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:psychon@znc.in" title="Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>"> <span class="fn">Uli Schlachter</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Do(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=59361#c2">comment #2</a>)
<span class="quote">> Created <span class=""><a href="attachment.cgi?id=74990" name="attach_74990" title="Bugfix?">attachment 74990</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=74990&action=edit" title="Bugfix?">[details]</a></span> <a href='page.cgi?id=splinter.html&bug=59361&attachment=74990'>[review]</a> [review]
> Bugfix?
>
> At least this patch makes the test case working here. But, I haven't tested
> it further and don't know howto. (Except from installing Qt5 stuff.)</span >
Doesn't this patch make Xlib lose track of sequence numbers? After all, this
GetInputFocus request is meant as a synchronization point to make sure that
something close to the current sequence number is known. (However, I don't know
much about Xlib internals)</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>