date DND

Dave Cridland [Home] dave at cridland.net
Tue Jul 22 17:03:20 EEST 2003


On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 10:57, Marc Mutz wrote:
> Why not simply define
>   application/(x-)datetime
> as holding a date-time in the rfc3339 profile of the iso8601 format? I 
> don't see any use in defining a proprietary format for this. The other 
> way around: It will bite you when you need to consider time zones 
> (which your proposal already leaves out) and other, more esoteric 
> features of our calendar system. I also don't see the point of not 
> allowing time at the same time.

Seems very sane, although I'd suggest "text/[x-]timestamp" might be more
inline with RFC3339 (text because it is human readable, timestamp
because it's more inline with the title of the RFC.)

Dave.





More information about the xdg mailing list