Xdg-list digest, Vol 1 #432 - 11 msgs

[Jody Goldberg]

On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 10:10:33AM -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> 
> This is why I'm insisting that the GLib thread is a distraction. If
> there's significant disagreement among core developers on GLib, as
> there is, we're not going to use it in shared platform libraries. End
> of story. Let's not worry about it.

My goal in proposing glib was not to advocate its use in interfaces,
although that would be nice.  Rather, I'd like to see it _installed_
as part of a base set of platform libraries.  The intended goal is
to lower the barrier to adoption for non-platform libraries that do
use glib.