HAL 0.1 release
joe at ximian.com
Thu Oct 9 23:59:48 EEST 2003
On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 16:27, Eric Gillespie wrote:
> I don't see how the current format has anything to do with
> *bindings*. You can present whatever kind of API you want; i am
> defending the file format. As long as the data is available in
> the file, libhal can present it however it likes.
With regards to the file format, why did you use tags like:
over a more structured-feeling format:
or to borrow a phrase from Havoc, abstraction through directories, in
which you'd have a linux directory which would have a device file with
... or something similar?
More information about the xdg