desktop-entry-spec.xml patch

[Ray Strode]

Hi,

> > > I'm not sure what you mean by "the format of the cache mirrors that of
> > > the desktop file".  The cache file is just key=value pairs, yes?  So it
> > > lacks a group header, and has other differences from a desktop file,
> > > yes?  I think maybe instead of "mirrors" the phrase "somewhat similar"
> > > or something along those lines would be a little clearer.
> Sounds like a good idea to me.  So, is the format going to be a fully
> compatible desktop file, e.g.,

So somehow I trimmed out the part of the message I was actually replying
to, which was:

> We should probably include a header anyway.  It gives us a chance to
> move to different formats for the cache.

--Ray Strode