rstrode at redhat.com
Tue Jul 13 03:04:45 EEST 2004
> > > I'm not sure what you mean by "the format of the cache mirrors that of
> > > the desktop file". The cache file is just key=value pairs, yes? So it
> > > lacks a group header, and has other differences from a desktop file,
> > > yes? I think maybe instead of "mirrors" the phrase "somewhat similar"
> > > or something along those lines would be a little clearer.
> Sounds like a good idea to me. So, is the format going to be a fully
> compatible desktop file, e.g.,
So somehow I trimmed out the part of the message I was actually replying
to, which was:
> We should probably include a header anyway. It gives us a chance to
> move to different formats for the cache.
More information about the xdg