configuration system notes
hp at redhat.com
Thu Apr 7 21:17:44 EEST 2005
On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 19:26 +0200, Waldo Bastian wrote:
> On Thursday 07 April 2005 16:18, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> > Existing systems are not right:
> > - Uniconf solves a different problem (gluing together other systems)
> > while punting on important aspects of what we should be doing here.
> > "Make it configurable" is not a good answer to most programming
> > questions (not even the question "how should the config system work")
> It seems useful to me if it can help with providing a smooth upgrade path,
> maybe Uniconf as backend for D-Conf?
Yep, entirely possible.
More information about the xdg