An analysis about a generic desktop application configuration management system
bastian at kde.org
Tue Apr 12 13:40:59 EEST 2005
On Tuesday 12 April 2005 00:44, Maks Orlovich wrote:
> Let me add a few of my views, to those of Rich I largely agree with:
> > > * Desktop applications from all environments can work together
> > > with a few common configuration-settings. There will be no more
> > > need to duplicate these settings
> > For me, this is a non-issue (I only care about KDE).
> It would also be necessary to show that the list is non-empty, and that any
> examples are meaningful, and not better addressed by less-invasive
> solutions (say XSettings)
XSettings doesn't touch on storage, it would solve the problem of applications
sharing common settings, it wouldn't solve the problem of managing those
settings. I would limit the use of XSettings to visual appearance.
> > > * There's a need for a default backend database format that can
> > > store Unicode data in a tree-like structure or in a structure
> > > that emulates a tree.
> You can emulate a tree in anything that's not bounded. So the requirement
> doesn't mean anything.
Some formats map easier than others, the current KCofnig .ini format doesn't
map nicely although I have some ideas for improving that. Compatibility
requirements make it non-trivial though.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xdg/attachments/20050412/89487006/attachment.pgp
More information about the xdg